Research Integrity
No evidence label exceeds the strongest documented validation state. Material errors trigger correction or retraction records.
These policies operationalize the Lab’s transparency standard. They define how evidence is labeled, corrected, credited, protected and disclosed, and are revised as the Lab accumulates contributors, users and commissioned work.
No evidence label exceeds the strongest documented validation state. Material errors trigger correction or retraction records.
Human-subject or sensitive-data work requires an explicit ethical and legal basis before collection.
Material financial, personal and commissioning conflicts are disclosed with affected outputs.
Collect the minimum personal data necessary; do not publish private personal data as evidence.
Corrections preserve version history, describe impact and link superseded releases. Retractions retain a public record of the reason and affected claims.
Credit follows documented contribution; advisory conversations are not authorship.
Core research information should remain readable without interactive JavaScript where feasible.
Original Lab code and documentation follow repository licensing; source-data rights remain with publishers.
Security or vulnerability reports are handled privately and remediated before unnecessary public technical detail is released.
Research Governance · Funding & Independence · Validation Dashboard · Annual Report 2026 · Transparency standard.